![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE CITY OF
RIGGINS URBAN RENEWAL
PLAN 2006 TABLE OF
CONTENTS A.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
B.
LIST OF FIGURES
C. AGENCY MEMBERS
1. INTRODUCTION
Deterioration Defined
Identifying Deteriorated Areas
Existing Social Conditions
Existing Economic Conditions
Other Factors
2. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION
Urban Renewal District Legal Description
Urban Renewal District Map
3. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS
General
Phase One (1)
Conformance
With State And Local Requirements
Participation Opportunities
Opportunities for owners and tenants
Property Acquisition
Property Management
Relocation of Businesses, Persons and Others
Disposition and Development Agreements
Agency Commitments
Developer Commitments
4.
USES PERMITTED IN PROJECT AREA
Comprehensive and Urban Renewal Plans
Designated land uses of the Comprehensive Plan
Regional / Community Commercial / Office
Public rights-of-way
Interim uses
Nonconforming uses
General controls and limitations
Construction
Rehabilitation and retention of property
5.
PROJECT FINANCING METHODS
General Description Of Financing Methodology
Bond Anticipation Notes
Tax Increment Funds
Loans And Grants
Community Development Block Grants
Local Improvement Districts
Loans And Advances
Tax Increment Guarantees
Certificates Of Participation
Joint Powers Authority
63-20 Debt
6.
TAX ALLOCATION DISTRICT AND AFFECTED AGENCIES
Tax Allocation District Legal Description
Affected Agencies
Tax Allocation District Map
7. ACTIONS BY THE CITY COUNCIL
8. ENFORCEMENT
9. DURATION OF THE PLAN
10. PLAN AMENDMENT PROCEDURES
11.
TAX FEASIBILITY STUDY
12. APPENDIXES
1.
Appendix A (Project
Costs)
2. Appendix
B
(IDAHO CODE SECTION 50-2008)
3.
Appendix C (NOTICE
OF PUBLIC HEARINGS)
4. Appendix
D
(Resolution No. 91-11)
5.
Appendix E (Resolution
No. 02-XX)
Agency Adoption of Plan
6.
Appendix F (Resolution
No. 02-XX)
Establishing Plan & Increment Area
7.
Appendix G (Ordinance
No. 02-XX)
RIGGINS URBAN
RENEWAL AGENCY 2006
CHAIR:
Bob Crump VICE-CHAIR:
Larry Barnard RIGGINS URBAN RENEWAL
PLAN INTRODUCTION: Riggins
is located in a spectacular setting in the Salmon River Canyon, at the
confluence of the Main and Little Salmon Rivers, adjacent to the Nez Perce
National Forest and Hells Canyon National Recreation Area. It lies in
southwestern Idaho County, in north central Idaho. The county
is the largest in Idaho, and the fourth largest in the United States, covering
8,503 square miles, 83% of which is public land. Riggins
was geographically isolated until 1937 when a north-south highway (U.S. 95) was
completed from Bonners Ferry to Boise. Positioned on Highway 95, Riggins is 41
miles south of Grangeville (Idaho County seat), and 160 miles north of Boise
(state capitol). Riggins is a resort and ranching community with a colorful
past. Mining gave the area its economic beginning in the late 1800s, and
contributed sporadically to the area's economy throughout its developing years.
The early mining towns attracted gold seekers, while the Homestead Act of 1862
influenced families to settle and entrepreneurs to establish businesses. Many
who had come to Idaho County to search for gold remained to take up agriculture,
finding their gold in the rich soil and favorable climatic conditions. By
the late 1800s, agriculture was a primary industry. While local sawmills were
producing lumber chiefly for home building, it was the huge demand for timber
after World War II that made lumber production a leading industry and an
economic asset to the area. In 1982, the sawmill in Riggins burned to the
ground, eliminating the area's largest employer. When it became apparent that
the mill would not be rebuilt due to inadequate and declining sales of timber
from the national forests, community leaders focused on tourism to sustain the
economy. Today Riggins is a year-round recreation destination, and a convenient
stopping place for north-south travelers in Idaho. The Riggins area increasingly
attracts outdoor recreation enthusiasts, former residents for return visits, and
pass-through scenic travelers. Key
attractions in Riggins and the surrounding area include:
Outdoor recreation: whitewater rafting, kayaking, and jet boating;
fishing for steelhead, salmon, trout, small mouth bass and sturgeon on the Salmon River; hunting for upland game birds, elk, deer, black bear, cougar and wild turkey; hiking and horse packing in the Nez Perce National Forest and the Frank Church Wilderness and Hells Canyon. Riggins’s proximity to Boise, and the recreational
centers of McCall and Donnelly, Idaho, makes it a prime location for residential
development, serving as a rural recreational community to larger metropolitan
areas. Riggins is also renowned around the world as a white-water Mecca, drawing
thousands of boaters to the city annually. Boise has a market population of
400,000, Idaho Falls 150,000, and Pocatello 130,000, many of whom seek the
recreational opportunities seen in Riggins. The City of Riggins contains a mixture of commercial
development, vacant lots, and lots that are underused or contain unsightly
conditions. Commercial development
has mainly occurred along Highway 95. This increase in growth and development
has been realized in recent years. Unfortunately, the capacity of the city’s
infrastructure has not kept pace, and is in need of upgrade.
This includes expanding the capacity of the city’s wastewater facility,
and water reservoir. In addition, a recreational community should focus
visitors’ attention on their greatest asset, which is the Salmon River. For
this reason, to boost its economic base, the city needs to make upgrades to its
parks and walking trails along the river. In
April 2006, community leaders developed five Goals for Economic Development. The leadership of Riggins recognizes the importance of developing a
strategic plan to address key economic development issues, create an environment
for successful business investment, and ultimately increase the community’s
standard of living. The main theme of the Plan is to facilitate efforts
community-wide among private and public partners to accomplish important goals
for securing the economic future of the community. The goals have been
identified to achieve successful community stability and quality of life. These
goals have resulted from a synthesis of ideas about the community’s position
in the marketplace, local strengths and challenges, potential opportunities, and
residents’ feelings about the future. In several ways, these goals embrace the
“Areas of Interest” prioritized by community members for achieving their
potential: Goal 1: Seek opportunities to enhance business support
services and encourage new business development. Goal
2: Address deficiencies in community infrastructure to support residences and
businesses. Goal 3: Improve recreation facilities to enhance quality
of life and tourism opportunities. Goal 4: Enhance community services to improve quality of
life for residents. Goal 5: Coordinate a strategic marketing program to
increase year-round tourism, retiree attraction and business development.
These goals that will be addressed via The Urban
Renewal Plan. It describes the project area and improvements, how those
improvements will be funded and outlines the powers, duties and obligations of
the Riggins Urban Renewal Agency (the Agency).
This plan, by way of adopted ordinance, establishes the Riggins Urban
Renewal Area and Tax Allocation District, approximately 800 acres.
The City has commissioned an economic feasibility study, which includes a
fiscal impact statement. The
economic feasibility study focuses on all aspects of the entire District, and
aspects directly related to the project area.
It is the intention of the Agency for much of the costs incurred by this
plan to be funded by tax allocation financing, for a period not to exceed ten
(10) years. The Riggins Urban Renewal district is proposed under
the deteriorated urban renewal law. For
instance, a phasing plan in these types of districts are usually unfeasible as
improvements made in one part of the district, may provide benefits to another
area of the district, by reducing traffic congestion, improving safety, and
reducing unfavorable items such as vacant lots, crime, and poor public
utilities, for example. This
generally requires that the entire urban renewal district be adopted as a tax
increment district because of interrelation of improvements and benefits with a
deteriorated urban renewal district, and the inability to predict what areas
exactly will benefit from an improvement made in a deteriorated urban renewal
district. DETERIORATION
DEFINED Under Idaho Local Economic Development Act (Municipal
Corporations Code, Sec. 50-290 et. seq.) the city council must find and
determine, on the basis of substantial evidence in the record, the project area
as a “deteriorated area” (when adopting an ordinance approving and adopting
Urban Renewal plan for a project area). The purpose of this chapter is to present the conditions of
deterioration as set forth in the Local Economic Development Act (LEDA), to show
how such conditions relate to categories of being deteriorated, and to provide
examples of the types of data to illustrate and substantiate the various
conditions of deterioration. The LEDA defines a deteriorated area as an area which
is characterized by one or more of the conditions set forth in Sections
50-2903(7), which conditions cause a reduction or lack of, proper utilization of
the area and place a burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected
to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone.
Section 50-2903(7) of the LEDA reads as follows: “(7)(a)
Any area, including slum area, in which there is a predominance of
buildings or improvements,
whether residential or nonresidential, which by reason of dilapidation,
deterioration, age or obsolescence, inadequate provision for ventilation, light,
air, sanitation, or open spaces, high density of population and overcrowding, or
the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other
causes, or any combination of such factors, is conducive to ill health,
transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, or crime, and
is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare. (b)
Any area which by reason of the presence of a substantial number of
deteriorated or deteriorating structures, predominance of defective or
inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy,
accessibility or usefulness, unsanitary or unsafe conditions, deterioration of
site or other improvements, diversity of ownership, tax or special assessment
delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land, defective or unusual
conditions of title, or the existence of conditions which endanger life or
property by fire and other causes, or any combination of such factors, results
in economic underdevelopment of the area, substantially impairs or arrests the
sound growth of a municipality, retards the provision of housing accommodations
or constitutes an economic or social liability and is a menace to the public
health, safety, morals or welfare in its present conditions and use. (c) Any
area which is predominately open and which because of obsolete platting,
diversity of ownership, deterioration of structures or improvements, or
otherwise, results in economic underdevelopment of the area, or substantially
impairs or arrests the sound growth of a municipality.
The provisions of section 50-2008(d), Idaho Code (see Appendix A), shall
apply to open areas. (d) Any
area which the local governing body certifies is in need of redevelopment or
rehabilitation as a result of a flood, storm, earthquake, or other natural
disaster or catastrophe respecting which the governor of the state has certified
the need for disaster assistance under any federal law. (e) Any
area which by reason of its proximity to the border of an adjacent state is
competitively disadvantaged in its ability to attract private investment,
business or commercial development which would promote the purposes of this
chapter.” Information presented in the deteriorated section of
the plan is divided in two divisions, which address the broad categories
prescribed by the law. Appropriate
headings for these major divisions are: “Existing
Social Conditions”, and “Existing Economic Conditions”.
Within these major divisions, subheadings are used, to the extent
applicable to the particular project area. IDENTIFYING
DETERIORATED AREAS 1.
Existing Social Conditions A. Unsafe
and hazardous traffic and pedestrian conditions exist which endanger life,
buildings and structures having conditions which are unfit or unsafe to occupy,
resulting from,
I.
Inadequate and Unsafe Public Rights of Way ·
Surfacing
of roadways in deterioration ·
Narrow
roadways ·
Partially
paved streets ·
Partially
completed rights-of-way ·
Unpaved
streets ·
Uncompleted
(dead end) rights of way II. Dilapidation
or Deterioration ·
Structural
conditions of buildings and poor site conditions in comparison to remainder of
City
III.
Age or Obsolescence ·
Age of
buildings ·
Obsolescence
is mainly applicable to industrial and commercial buildings where size, layout,
or other original design features may no longer be appropriate to current uses. 2.
Existing Economic Conditions A. Public
Rights of Way, Buildings, Structures, and Conditions as described previously
which result in economic underdevelopment of the area. I.
Inadequate and sub-standard traffic movements and flow ·
Streets,
sidewalks, curbs, gutters non existent or in disrepair ·
Poor
traffic circulation ·
Street
lighting non existent or in disrepair
II..
Substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a municipality.
a. Inadequate public
improvements ·
Public
improvements should be surveyed to determine adequacy/inadequacy by using the
following factors: ü
poor
physical condition ü
age ü
deterioration ü
improper
design ü
lack of
sufficient capacity ü
total
absence of improvement in face of demonstrable need.
b. Inadequate Public
Facilities -
Need to
be evaluated as in “a” (above) ·
Parks
·
Parking
Facilities ·
Pedestrian/biking
Trails
c. Inadequate Utilities -
Should be
evaluated as in “a” (above) ·
Water
processing and distribution facilities ·
Gas ·
Electrical
(above ground/underground) ·
Cable
television ·
Telephone ·
Sewerage
treatment facilities ·
Sewers,
storm drains
III..
Retards the provision of housing accommodations or constitutes an economic or social liability
and is a menace to the public health,
safety, morals or welfare in its present condition and use.
a. Shifting of uses ·
Rapid
changes in tenants within commercial structures (this week a thrift store, used
furniture the next week) ·
Conversions
to uses other than the original use
(service station converted to fast food operation)
b. Prevalence of depreciated
values
c. Prevalence of impaired
investments An
“impaired investment” is a rented or leased commercial, industrial or
residential property on which the values or the return on the owner’s equity
are diminished or have stopped altogether, and/or the equity itself is in danger
of being partially or totally lost. These
conditions are evidenced by: ·
Decline
in gross sales or gross rents. ·
In
ordinate increases in expenses due to circumstances existing in the area (such
as higher insurance costs, inability to obtain insurance
at all or higher costs for security protection) ·
Increasing
vacancy rates ·
Inability
to sell properties at reasonable prices ·
Inability
to obtain loans to maintain, rehabilitate or expand
·
Increased
public safety related issues
d. Prevalence of economic
maladjustment ·
Business
failures and move-outs ·
Declining
employment figures ·
Increasing
unemployment ·
Vacant
stores, and buildings ·
Declining
business registrations. ·
Declining
property tax revenues and increasing police and
fire services ·
Declining
sales taxes or stagnation of same ·
Inability
of property owners to bear special assessments
·
Low
incomes of residents f. Existing land uses inappropriate to needs of businesses, industries and residents of city. ·
The
existence of vacant or partially vacant buildings of recent construction
·
The
existence of unused or unique facilities of marginal need or usefulness
·
Lack of
expansion area ·
Lack of
proper access for customers & deliveries ·
Lack of
transportation facilities ·
Lack of
adequate parking ·
Lack of
necessary utilities (water, power) ·
Improper
zoning 3.
Other Factors The
conditions of deterioration affect the entire project area.
Non-blighted properties have been included because their inclusion is
necessary for effective redevelopment. RIGGINS URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT Metes & Bounds Description
A
tract of land located in Sections 10, 11, 14, 15 and 22, T24N R1E, Boise
Meridian, City of Riggins, Idaho County, Idaho, consisting of the following
Idaho County Assessor Tax Numbers: CITY
OF RIGGINS Tax
# 31
Tax #90
Tax #152 Tax
#230
Tax #233
Tax #140 Tax
#217
Tax #111`
Tax #272 Tax#
96
Tax #97
Tax #109
Riggins
Original Township, Block 2, Lots 3,4,6,7; Block 3, Lots 2,7 and portions of
1,5,6 Chukar
Point Subdivision: Lots
1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,11 North
Riggins Addition, Block D, Lots 1,2 Smith
Subdivision: Lot 8 IDAHO
COUNTY (In Annexation Process) Tax
62
Tax #162
Tax #94 Tax
#112
Tax 145 Non-TAX
PUBLIC PROPERTY City
of Riggins, Tax #207, #208, #248, #150, #166,
#18, #81 USFS-NRA
Tax #238 School
Dist #241 Tax #125, #126, #153, #20, #25 IOOF
Tax #85, #247 State
of Idaho Tax #19 US
Highway #95 City
of Riggins Streets: Ace’s
Place, Salmon River Drive, MacArthur Avenue,
North Street, Berger Street, Salmon Street, Well Street, Chukar Lane RIGGINS
URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT PROPOSED BOUNDARIES DRAWN IN YELLOW
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS: General The
major objective of this urban renewal plan is to provide traffic improvements
and other public improvements, which implement the goals of the Riggins Urban
Renewal Agency (URA), and the City. The
URA has established goals for the proposed area, which are as follows: A.
Re-design and improve existing streets in the district, including
redesigning intersections, widening of roadways, signalization, and pedestrian
access B.
Encourage and assist the development of new businesses and residences in
the area. C. Provide the necessary
infrastructure support for the attraction of new
business. D.
Rehabilitate existing vacant lots that have become collection points for
junk. The
proposed projects, by highest priority, include:
As
shown, the City of Riggins is also confronted by several major impediments in
generating economic vitality. In
promoting the Riggins Area to developers (within the city itself as well as to
those entities who are looking to relocate, expand or startup) the URA and the
City recognize that these impediments do exist and where possible, eliminate or
mitigate them. These impediments include but are not limited to the following: A. Inadequate and unsafe
public rights-of-way B. Lack of traffic circulationC. Lack of infrastructureD. Lack of maintenance of
public & private property - blight E. Lack of amenities F. Business closures G. Lack of open space (parks
and recreation) H. Inaccessible to pedestrians
- unfriendly I. Low development
densities J. Lack of
commercial diversity K.. Lack of fire protection capital
assets This
plan cannot overcome all the impediments listed above, but if the aforementioned
goals are achieved the economic vitality of the Riggins Area will be greatly
enhanced and will eliminate or minimize most of them.
Given the lack of infrastructure and amenities in the Riggins area it is
financially feasible to achieve all the objectives within a ten (10) year time
frame. The plan is therefore broken down into a one (1) phase description.
Below
are the overall costs with this project as identified in appendix A of the
Riggins Urban Renewal Plan. Site Improvement Costs
$2,400,000
Below
are the overall costs with this project as identified in appendix A of the
Riggins Urban Renewal Plan. Site Improvement Costs
$375,000
Below
are the overall costs with this project as identified in appendix A of the
Riggins Urban Renewal Plan. Site Improvement Costs
$355,000
Below
are the overall costs with this project as identified in appendix A of the
Riggins Urban Renewal Plan. Site Improvement Costs
$202,000
Below
are the overall costs with this project as identified in appendix A of the
Riggins Urban Renewal Plan. Site Improvement Costs
$552,000 OVERALL PROJECT GRAND TOTAL: $3,884,000 Conformance With State And Local Requirements The
proposed redevelopment as proposed in this plan conforms to the Comprehensive
Plan for the City of Riggins, which was adopted by City Council.
This plan was reviewed by the Riggins Planning and Zoning Commission,
stating that this plan is in conformity with the Riggins Comprehensive Plan. Property
Acquisition Pursuant
to State Code Section 50-2007 the URA may acquire (by purchase, lease, option,
gift, grant, bequest, devise, eminent domain or otherwise) real property to
hold, improve, renovate, rehabilitate, clear, or prepare such property for
redevelopment. Absent the consent of the property owner, the URA will not
acquire any property, which will not require modification or the imposition of
restrictions. In conjunction with
the acquisition of a site, the URA shall accomplish the relocation of existing
businesses and tenants. Property Management The
URA may convey property it has acquired for less than market value. The URA may
clear or move buildings, structures or improvements from any real property
acquired, and the URA may develop a building site by constructing streets,
utilities, parks, playgrounds and other public improvements in order to carry
out the urban renewal plan. The URA may acquire land or other public
improvements and construct facilities within and/or outside the plan area if it
can determine that the improvements are of benefit to the plan area.
However, the URA shall not pay for maintenance or operation of said
improvement. Relocation Of Businesses, Persons And Others If
as a result of pursuing this plan individuals, families, businesses, non-profit
organizations or others are required to relocate, the URA shall prepare a plan
for the relocation of same. The URA shall be responsible to assist those
individuals and entities in full accordance with state and federal statutes,
including finding a new location and providing relocation payments. Disposition And Development Agreements The
Disposition and Development Agreements (DDA) are the legal documents that form
Public/Private partnerships. They
are used by the URA when entering into an agreement with a private developer for
a specific project. The list below
is merely illustrative and not all inclusive and does not prevent the Agency
from including, or excluding any or some of the commitments: 1. The Agency’s
Commitments a) What it will do: ·
site
acquisition ·
site
improvements ·
parking ·
off site
improvements, etc. b)
Determines how much the public investment is, and how it will be
financed 2. The Developer’s
Commitments a) A specific
development concept: ·
mix of
uses ·
building
size ·
number of
parking spaces ·
quality
of development, etc. b) Payments to the
Agency, which can be in the form of : ·
payment
for fee simple sale of land ·
land
payment for ground lease ·
lease
payments for public facilities ·
commitments
towards paying other sources of public financing, such as special assessment
bonds ·
participation
- percentage of future cash flows ·
loans and
advances ·
tax
increment guarantees c) Firm time schedules
and contingencies affecting the timing d) Agreement to operate
(e.g. Hotel) for a minimum number of years USES
PERMITTED IN PROJECT AREA: Comprehensive
And Urban Renewal Plans The primary objectives for the Urban Renewal Agency
are to improve the quality of life, bring economic vitality and improve the
aesthetics of the Riggins area through development and redevelopment.
There are two (2) differing sets of land use issues involved in this plan
. The first set of issues deal with the designated or planned land uses of the
comprehensive plan and the second set of issues revolve around existing
non-conforming land uses, meaning uses which don’t conform to the planned uses
in the comprehensive plan. Designated Land
Uses Of The Comprehensive Plan The Urban Renewal District land uses are consistent
with the Generalized Land Use Map of the Riggins Comprehensive Plan.
If the necessary resources are available, the Urban Renewal Agency will
assist any project that desires support, but that project must be consistent
with this urban renewal plan and the comprehensive plan of the city. The
following is a list of the land uses in the Urban Renewal Plan as it is
described in the comprehensive plan. All proposed uses must comply with the
appropriate land use designation in which it will be located. Regional
/ Community Commercial / Office: Most
commercial properties are found in the urban renewal plan area along Highway 95.
The function of this area is to provide regional, local and tourist needs
in readily accessible locations. Existing compatible land uses within the plan
area consists of a mixture of office, retail and service commercial uses as well
as vacant properties. Public Rights-Of-Way: With
few exceptions, most of the public rights-of-way in the area are deficient in
terms of development and are poorly maintained. Curbs, gutters and sidewalks are
practically non-existent, except where Highway 95 is located. Street infrastructure is inadequate and is a major drawback
to most kinds of beneficial development. Interim Uses: There
may be a need for the temporary use of vacant properties and/or structures
within the plan area. If these uses are to be supported and/or assisted by the
Urban Renewal Agency, they shall be compatible with the current land use
designations of the comprehensive plan. Non-Conforming Uses: Uses
which do not conform to the Riggins Urban Renewal Plan and/or the City of
Riggins Comprehensive Plan and/or zoning map are not eligible for support or
assistance from the Urban Renewal Agency. General
Controls And Limitations Construction: All
construction which is funded or partially funded by the Urban Renewal Agency as
a part of this plan will be required to meet all applicable city and state
specifications. In addition, each project must meet any requirements made by the
URA as a condition of assistance. Such requirements may be in the form of
additional performance and development standards. Construction may be by the
Agency independently, or in conjunction with any other public agency. Rehabilitation And Retention Of Property: Rehabilitation
of dilapidated commercial structures is an objective of the URA, in as much as
the use of the structure complies with the plan and revenues available for
assistance. Except in extenuating circumstances, ownership retention will always
be a priority for most projects undertaken by the URA. PROJECT
FINANCING METHODS: General
Description Of Financing Methodology State law provides that urban renewal agencies have the power to finance urban renewal
(redevelopment) activities and related costs. Agencies can issue both short and
long term debt with existing and projected revenues. The debt of an urban
renewal agency can be it’s own, or, it can include any assignments of revenues
from others. For the most part,
urban renewal agencies utilize tax increment financing (TIF) as the financing
tool. However, Government Code
Section 50-2007(f) allows other financing mechanisms, as well.
The following. are merely illustrative, and is not an all inclusive list,
nor do they bind the Urban Renewal Agency to use one or any of the following
financing mechanisms:
1.
advances
2.
loans
3.
grants
4.
contributions
5.
any other form of financial assistance from public or private
sources Bond
Anticipation Notes Bond Anticipation Notes (BANs) are utilized when an
agency needs to raise higher levels of financing than possible with a standard
financing mechanism. The basic assumption of BAN financing is that tax
increments will grow substantially over several years, due in part or whole to
the application of the BANs funding to agency programs, and the agency will
subsequently be able to afford a standard financing to refinance the BANs when
the whole principal balance becomes due. BANs will typically have interest only
payments for the short duration of the financing term, with all principal coming
due in anticipation of a fully amortized standard bond financing that will
refinance or take out the BANs. BANs can raise substantial capital in advance of tax
increment generation and project development. These notes can provide funding
which can encourage private development in the early stages of the project when
“seed” capital is needed most. The customary BAN structure calls for the forecasting
of tax increment revenues several years into the future, making an assumption
about what interest rates will be at the end of the forecast / finance period,
and then issuing short (two to three year) to medium (four to six year) notes.
The financing program anticipates that the notes will be fully amortized
standard bonds when the notes mature. Ban financing often includes a large component of capitalized
(prepaid from note proceeds) interest, as the agency can typically not support
full interest payments on the notes with tax increment funds. Thus, for $100.00
of program funding, a BAN financing will require two sets of costs of issuance
(both the BAN and permanent bond financing) totaling approximately $7.00 per
hundred, plus at least $20.00 per hundred of capitalized interest. When the
takeout bonds are issued, the agency will be borrowing over $127.00 (plus
reserves) to pay for $100.00 of initial project funding. Despite the higher financing costs, in a relatively
stable legal, political and financial climate BANs can prove to be quite
effective. The URA can borrow substantial additional funds
compared to a standard financing mechanism and after investing these funds in
project improvements, cause further tax increment revenue growth. The concept is
an attractive and convenient one that answers the problems facing any project
area. Subsidies and public
investment are needed up front to spur development that generates tax increment
within twelve to eighteen months following construction. The risk is straight forward - if the tax increment
does not grow as projected and is not adequate to support a standard financing
to take out the BAN when it comes due, the agency faces a number of unpleasant
choices, including borrowing funds from the city to help retire the note debt,
rolling the BAN with a second BAN issue, or default. The typical option utilized
is to roll the BAN in the hope that revenues will be high enough when the second
issue of BAN matures to take out the note permanently. The accuracy of the tax increment forecast is
absolutely critical to the success of the program, market / interest rate
fluctuations are also a significant variable, and the ability to “take-out”
the BAN with bonds is subject to legal and political factors which are beyond
the control of the URA. A successful BAN financing must take these variables
fully into account. A taxable BAN which is to be taken out with taxable
bonds make more sense than tax-exempt notes because one of the primary risks,
alterations of the tax law, is essentially removed. Because taxable financing is typically utilized as bridge
financing, waiting for private repayments, the short term nature of a BAN can be
most effective. Tax Increment
Funds Tax increment financing is the principal method of
financing the public costs of redevelopment. “Ad Valorem” property taxes
generated from the increase in assessed valuation of property values, created by
new development within a specified project area, is the major source of tax
increment revenue. The assessed valuation at the time of adoption of the urban
renewal plan becomes the base year value and is frozen at that level for the
purpose of distribution of taxes to the various affected taxing entities. Each
fiscal year, following the adoption of an urban renewal plan, the taxes
generated by the assessed valuation that exceeds the base year level (known as
tax increment) is paid to the urban renewal agency. The URA in turn utilizes
these funds for the repayment of debt incurred by the URA in connection with
redeveloping the project area. When an urban renewal project is approved, there
isn’t any tax increment immediately available to the agency. The fiscal year
following the adoption of the project there is an opportunity for some tax
increment to be generated, but only if the assessed valuation of the area has
increased from the prior year. Normally very little funding is available within the
first few years of a project. Therefore, funding for the initial cost of a
project and the costs of implementation must be provided from other sources.
Many times the city will loan funds to the URA, or provide the capital
improvements in the project area with the URA agreeing to reimburse the city
when the agency receives its revenues. In other situations, a developer may loan the agency
the necessary startup funds. If there is a property owner or a developer who
desires to build a project in an urban renewal area, the developer may loan the
agency funds for both the startup costs as well as the capital improvements.
A portion, or all of the funds advanced would be repaid by the agency
pursuant to an agreement with the developer. Loans And
Grants Community Development Block Grants: The
Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) program replaced a number of specific
aid programs (such as the former federal Urban Renewal program) to allow local
communities broader discretion in the administration of community development
funds. Eligible activities include acquisition of property, clearance and
demolition, relocation, public facilities and historic preservation. The funds
must be targeted to specific areas to benefit low and moderate income persons or
to eliminate slums and blight. CDBG funds are widely used throughout the state
for economic development and senior facilities. Local Improvement Districts: Local
Improvement Districts (LID) have been used to fund public improvements that
benefit private development. LID’s place upon the benefited property the costs
which are not borne by the urban renewal agency (or city). The State of Idaho
has determined that LID’s are a legal means for the city to fund such
improvements. Formation of an LID requires the approval of a majority of the
property owners in the affected area. The costs of the improvements are
determined, and each property is assigned its prorata share. The LID expenses
are paid off via the tax rolls over a predetermined period of time (usually 15
to 20 years). Loans and Advances: The
URA may borrow funds for a project from the city or a lending institution. The drawback being the rate of interest.
In addition, developers may advance or loan working capital to urban
renewal agencies for preliminary redevelopment activities. Generally the
developer is at risk with these advances and will be repaid only if the project
goes forward. Tax Increment Guarantees: The
willingness, or ability, of an urban renewal agency to incur project financial
obligations for a specific development may be based on a projection that the
development will produce tax increments in a certain amount, within a definite
period of time. As an inducement to the urban renewal agency to proceed with its
part of the development activities, such as paying for the costs of public
facilities to serve the development, a developer may agree to guarantee to the
URA the receipt of tax increments from the development in the amount and by the
time projected. Certificates Of Participation: Certificates
of Participation (COP’s) provide long term financing through a lease with an
option to purchase, (also called a conditional sale agreement). This financing
method is used for long term financing of major projects such as public
facilities, parking garages, and recreational activities.
Where
applicable, this financing method can also be used to finance the acquisition of
motorized equipment, communications equipment, computers, and other major items
of equipment. When
a public sale of a lease, or COP’s in a lease, is planned the principle
parties include:
1.
The public agency
2.
A bank, financial institution or lender (buys the present value of
future
lease payments)
3.
Purchasers or investors (purchase the COP’s)
4.
A trustee (holds security for payment of lease - if any)
5.
An escrow agency (the trustee may also be the escrow agency) Lease
agreements are for one year at a time resulting in the COP’s commanding a
higher interest rate. The URA would also have to comply with state public
bidding for construction laws, usury and legal interest rate laws authorizing
the lease and disclosure requirements. Joint Powers Authority: By
agreement multiple public entities with common powers may form a Joint Powers
Authority (J.P.A.) when it is to the advantage of those agencies to consolidate
their forces to construct a public use facility or issue debt for public
purposes that when done separately would be less advantageous. A joint exercise
of power agreement must be approved by the participating entities in order to
utilize a J.P.A. The security of
any issue of a J.P.A. will depend upon the existing or projected cash flows,
reserves, and other capital resources of the participating agencies and the
approved obligations of each agency. In some cases it may be advantageous for
the URA to form a J.P.A. before debt obligations are approved by the individual
agencies. 63-20 Debt: States
and political subdivisions are authorized, under federal tax law, to issue
obligations, the interest on which is exempt from federal income taxation
(“Tax-exempt bond”). Each state
has statutes and administrative rules that outline the terms under which
tax-exempt bonds may be issued. There
are circumstances, however, when a political subdivision would prefer not
to issue bonds for a project. These
reasons may be legal, practical or political.
A facility may qualify for tax-exempt financing, because of its use by a
governmental entity; nevertheless, the governmental entity elects not to finance
the project with its own tax-exempt bonds. An alternative method of obtaining tax-exempt financing is
available under the Internal Revenue Code.
This method of financing is commonly referred to as “63-20”
financing. The term “63-20”
comes from the Department of Treasury Revenue Ruling which first described and
authorized this type of tax-exempt financing (in 1963). In
a 63-20 financing, a nonprofit corporation may issue tax-exempt debt for the
purpose of financing facilities as long as certain requirements are met. The most well-known requirement is that title to the
facilities must be transferred to a governmental entity when the debt is
retired. Interest on 63-20 debt is
exempt from federal income taxation. Therefore,
the cost of capital is, lower than it would be in the conventional capital
markets. Historically,
63-20 debt was primarily used for nonprofit corporations, qualified under
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, to access the tax-exempt bond
market. 63-20 debt is sold as
tax-exempt bonds generally in the same financial markets as governmental tax
exempt bonds. The interest rates
may be comparable, depending upon the credit strength of the collateral
security. If the financed facility is leased to an entity other than the nonprofit issuer of the debt, the tenant is required to be either a governmental entity or a charitable organization. An underwriter may underwrite long term (20 years or more) bonds issued by the nonprofit corporation. The credit support of the bonds may derive from the lease of the facility to the governmental agency. The bonds may be issued on a non-recourse basis to the nonprofit corporation, i.e., the bonds would be secured solely by lease revenues. In a non-recourse financing, the owners of the bonds would have no recourse against any other assets of the corporation. LEGAL
DESCRIPTION URBAN RENEWAL
DISTRICT THE TAX
ALLOCATION DISTRICT FOR THE RIGGINS URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT AREA AS DEFINED BY THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED BOUNDARY: A
tract of land located in Sections 10, 11, 14, 15 and 22, T24N R1E, Boise
Meridian, City of Riggins, Idaho County, Idaho, consisting of the following
Idaho County Assessor Tax Numbers: CITY
OF RIGGINS Tax
# 31
Tax #90
Tax #152 Tax
#230
Tax #233
Tax #140 Tax
#217
Tax #111`
Tax #272 Tax# 96 Tax #97 Tax #109
Riggins
Original Township, Block 2, Lots 3,4,6,7; Block 3, Lots 2,7 and portions of
1,5,6 Chukar
Point Subdivision: Lots
1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,11 North
Riggins Addition, Block D, Lots 1,2 Smith
Subdivision: Lot 8 IDAHO
COUNTY (In Annexation Process) Tax
62
Tax #162
Tax #94 Tax
#112
Tax 145 Non-TAX
PUBLIC PROPERTY City
of Riggins, Tax #207, #208, #248, #150, #166,
#18, #81 USFS-NRA
Tax #238 School
Dist #241 Tax #125, #126, #153, #20, #25 IOOF
Tax #85, #247 State
of Idaho Tax #19 US
Highway #95 City
of Riggins Streets: Ace’s
Place, Salmon River Drive, MacArthur Avenue, North Street, Berger Street, Salmon Street, Well Street, Chukar Lane Affected
Agencies The following is a list of agencies which are
affected by the “Riggins Urban Renewal Plan”.
Recent changes in Idaho tax law have (excepting urban
renewal agencies and school districts) have neutralized the drawbacks to the
creation of Tax Allocation Districts and Urban Renewal Districts.
Currently, public agencies budgets are restricted to 3% annual growth
from property taxes. At the end of a project’s life, the tax increment generated
was divided among the above-mentioned agencies in accordance to their respective
agency’s property tax levy rates. With the current laws in effect, the tax
increment is now used to lower property tax rates resulting in benefiting the
property tax payers with no provision for assisting the impacted agencies.
Public agency budgets are not benefited by property taxes generated from new
development; but neither are they hurt by the formation of a Tax Allocation
District for an Urban Renewal Agency. RIGGINS URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT PROPOSED BOUNDARIES DRAWN IN YELLOW
ACTIONS BY
THE CITY COUNCIL: The City shall aid and cooperate with the URA in
carrying out this plan and shall take all actions necessary to ensure the
continued fulfillment of the purposes and objectives of this plan. The City
shall assist and support the URA in preventing and eliminating the spread and/or
recurrence of conditions causing blight in the plan area. Actions by the City
shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 1.
Institution and completion of proceedings necessary for changes and
improvements in private and publicly owned utilities within or affecting the
project area. 2.
Revising of standards (if necessary) within the project area to permit
the development authorized by this plan. 3.
Imposition, wherever necessary, through the use of special use permits or
other means of appropriate controls within the limits of this plan upon parcels
of land within the project area to ensure their proper development and use. 4.
Where possible, preservation of historical sites shall have a high
priority in achieving development objectives. 5.
Performance of the above actions and all other functions and services
relating to public health, safety, and physical development normally rendered in
accordance with the schedule which will permit the redevelopment of the project
area to be commenced and carried to completion without unnecessary delays. 6.
If necessary, institution and completion of proceedings for the
establishment of a Local Improvement District, or districts under Chapter 17,
Title 50, Idaho Code. 7.
Administration of Community Development Block Grants and/or other
state/federal funds that may be available and are used for the purposes of this
plan. 8.
The undertaking and completion of any other proceedings necessary to
carry out the plan. 9.
Appropriate agreements with the URA for administration, supporting
services, funding sources, and other similar needs. 10.
The actions listed above which are to be taken by the City do not
constitute any commitment of financial outlay by the City. ENFORCEMENT The enforcement and administration of this plan,
including the preparation and execution of all the documents used for the
implementation of the Riggins Plan, shall be performed by the URA and/or the
City of Riggins. The provisions of
the Riggins Plan and other documents used pursuant to this plan may also be
enforced by court litigation instituted by either the City or the URA.
Remedies include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Specific performance 2. Damages 3. Injunctions 4. Other appropriate
remedies DURATION OF
THE PLAN The duration of the various segments which make up
this urban renewal plan for the Riggins area are as follows: A.
The non-discrimination and non-segregation provisions of this plan shall
be effective in perpetuity. B.
Other provisions of this plan shall be effective for ten (10) years from
the date of adoption of this plan by the Urban Renewal Agency. C.
The Tax Allocation District and its respective revenue allocation
financing shall be in effect for a period not to exceed ten (10) years. PLAN
AMENDMENT PROCEDURES The Riggins Urban Renewal Plan may be further
modified at any time by the URA, provided that the modification, if made after
disposition of real property by the URA in the plan area, must be consented to
by the developer(s) or successor(s) of interest of such real property if their
interest is substantially affected by the proposed modification. Where the proposed modification substantially alters
the adopted plan, the modifications must be approved by the Urban Renewal Agency
Board, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council in the same
manner as the original plan. Substantial changes for Council purposes shall
include revisions to the following: 1. Project area
boundaries 2. Permitted land uses 3. Land Acquisition 4. Changes to plan
objectives Tax Allocation
Feasibility Study For The Riggins
Redevelopment Area Executive Summary
The use of the Tax Allocation Financing
Provision in the proposed Riggins Redevelopment Area Urban Renewal District is
feasible under the existing taxing laws.
Financing of the listed projects is projected by increment received
through tax increment financing. The following table shows the dollar
amount of improvements for the total Urban Renewal Plan.
Table
1 Summary of Infrastructure Investment
Methodology
Tax allocation financing is a method of
providing revenue for economic development projects in urban renewal areas.
As part of an urban renewal plan, a revenue tax allocation financing
provision is approved. Within the urban renewal area, a tax allocation area is
created. Within the tax allocation
area, a base assessment roll is established which is equal to the assessment
rolls for all classes of taxable property as of January 1st of the year the
urban renewal plan is adopted; in this case, 2006.
As new investment increases the assessed value within the tax allocation
area, the increase in tax revenues is allocated to paying off bonds issued for
public improvements. By using this
form of financing, local taxing districts make a short-term sacrifice in receipt
of added tax revenues in exchange for a long-term tax revenue increase due to
added investment in the urban renewal area.
This is partly mitigated by caps on increases in spending for tax
districts. However, the
beneficiaries are taxpayers. With
added revenues and a ceiling on increased spending, the result for taxpayers is
a reduction in the levy rate and decreased taxes. To determine the feasibility of a tax
increment financing provision for improving the Riggins Redevelopment Area, the
first task was to list all properties by parcel number. Then, for each parcel within the taxing area, the number of
acres, market value by category and exemptions were listed.
An inventory of actual land uses was compiled to provide a better
understanding of the availability of land for future development and to provide
a base for preparation of projections of future use. With a complete inventory of properties
and their existing market values, a baseline projection of tax revenues was
created. This projection assumed
that growth trends would continue as they have in the past with no sudden
increase in investment activity in the area.
Growth rates for each sector were applied to existing land uses and then
projected into the future. Next, a projection of tax revenue was
prepared assuming that a tax allocation provision is approved. This projection assumes a 3% increase in the levy rate of
revenue each taxing district (except for the county, because of the impact of
new growth throughout other areas of the county) while the bonds are being paid.
It also shows the tax increases that will result when the bonds are paid
and the entire tax revenue amount is allocated to reduce tax levy rate.
Part of this measurement determined how long the increment would need to
be in place before the first phase improvement project could be financed with a
positive cash flow. Of course, if
new investment in the area occurs above the normally anticipated growth, the
length of time required to create sufficient revenue decreases proportionate to
the amount of new investment.
Determination of feasibility will be made
by the City of Riggins in their action to either approve or disapprove the urban
renewal plan and the tax allocation provision.
However, a statement of feasibility has been prepared which indicated
whether a tax allocation provision is financially feasible.
That statement affirms that the tax allocation provision is financially
feasible. Redevelopment Planning Area
Size and Parcels
The Idaho County Assessor has designated
the parcels within the redevelopment area.
A
complete listing of parcels, their size and use classification is provided in
Appendix 1.
Planned infrastructure developments
include upgrades to the City’s wastewater and water plants, plus emergency
services, off-street parking and parks and recreation. The timing of these improvements depends
upon the demand for services in the area and the amount of incremental
investment made in the area. The
incremental investment will provide the tax revenue necessary for issuing bonds
to pay for the improvements. In some instances, potential developers
may agree to guarantee the City’s incremental investments, so as to expedite
the expenditures ahead of the anticipated tax revenues.
Resident Population
Most of the redevelopment area is
residential. It is likely that
additional residences will be constructed to complete the residential build-out
of previously platted lots, including the large parcel owned by Brown
Industries.
Industrial Development
There is little demand for industrial
development in the area. Riggins is
mostly a residential community, and as such boasts a modest commercial district
to serve the population. Therefore, no industrial development is anticipated in
the area.
Commercial Development
Expansion of commercial uses in the
redevelopment area will be included, however.
Current commercial use will likely grow to the area’s capacity by 2017.
Also, existing commercial areas will likely be redeveloped to newer structures
and more intensive uses during the development period.
Private
Sector Investment Potential A projection of private sector investment
(and market value) has been prepared for the build-out of the redevelopment
area. The following table shows the
anticipated growth in private sector investment in each economic sector through
the year 2015. Table
2 Riggins
Redevelopment Area Private
Sector Investment Growth, 2007 to 2014
Source:
Panhandle Area Council
Property Tax Generation
As investment occurs in the Riggins
Redevelopment Area, additional taxes will be generated.
The following table shows a summary of the tax generation anticipated at
normal growth rates within the redevelopment area. Of course, as new infrastructure investment occurs in the
area, the development rate will increase. However,
this projection assumes a normal rate of growth with services provided to
support the growth. Table
3 Riggins
Redevelopment Area Property
Tax Generation, 2007 to 2016
Job Creation
Job creation is estimated based on the
acreage growth of the commercial sector that translates into the construction
of buildings based on lot coverage ratios.
Using standards for the number of square feet per employee results in
an estimate of the number of employees likely to be located within the
redevelopment area. The following
table shows the potential job growth: Table
4 HIGWAY
95 Redevelopment Job Creation and Employment Growth 2007 to 2017
Source:
Panhandle Area Council Tax Allocation Project Projection
The following projection is based on the
normal growth rates described in the section above.
Of course, these are merely projections and unanticipated changes in
the area or economic growth rates can accelerate or slow down the estimates.
However, they are made with the best available projections from the
Idaho State Department of Revenue.
Improvements will be thoroughly described in the
Urban Renewal Plan. These improvements include wastewater and water
improvements, emergency services, parking and parks and recreation items.
The timing of these improvements will depend upon the growth in the
area and the demand for urban services. This
projection is prepared to describe a scenario based on the assumptions
described previously in this report. Several assumptions have been made
regarding the future. These
assumptions are described in the following paragraphs. Levy
Rates
It is assumed that levy rates for all
taxing districts affected by the Tax Allocation District will increase
somewhat, except the county’s, which will remain constant. Also, based on legislation passed in August 2006, the .004
levy rate for school Maintenance and Operation will no longer be levied,
replaced by a 1 cent increase in the sales tax. These rates are shown in the
following table. Table
5 Levy
Rates
Source
Idaho County Auditor Coverage Ratio
The coverage ratio applied to the Riggins
Urban Renewal Project’s Tax Increment Revenues is 115%. Application of a coverage ratio greater than 100% has the
effect of reducing the projected amount of revenue that can be applied to
serving the bonds. Coverage
ratios are applied to create a margin of safety should tax revenues fall short
of expectations. In this
projection, actual revenue collected is used in the year following the year it
was collected. In this way,
actual revenue is accounted for and not the amount available for debt service
due to the coverage ratio. Although
the District may issue Tax Anticipation Notes for accrued taxes not yet paid,
that funding mechanism is not used in this scenario. In addition, a present value discount of
3% is used in the projections. This
helps to account for the inflationary effects on taxes received. Personal Property Investment
No value is added for personal property
(equipment, fixtures, etc.). This
property is also taxed and is subject to the tax increment but has been
omitted from the projections to provide an added measure of margin. School
Payments
Previous tax law assigned a percentage of
new tax increment revenues to the school districts.
That changed in August 2006, where after no
Maintenance and Operations funds will be levied. Determination of the Timing of the Required
Incremental Tax Base
As development occurs within the Riggins
Redevelopment Area, additional investment will add incremental tax revenues.
Based on our growth assumptions, there will be sufficient increment
added to the redevelopment area by the year 2007.
Since taxes are not collected until the following year, the tax
required to pay for bonds will be available in 2008.
The table on the following page, (Table 6,
Anticipated Tax Increment Growth and Timing) shows this anticipated growth and
the amount of incremental taxes expected.
A slight shortfall is anticipated in the second and third years (2008
and 2009) but will be quickly recouped. From
that time on, the balance in the fund remains positive. The interest rates established for the
repayment of the bonds will be according to the municipal bond market
standards at the time the bonds are issued.
This project anticipates an interest rate of 4.0%. Fiscal Impact on Taxing Districts and
Taxpayers
The fiscal impact on taxing districts will
be to increase available revenue to the districts by collection of forgone
taxes and a reduction in the levy rate applied to the valuation of their
property. Limits are placed on the increase in
budget a taxing district can spend even with a substantial increase in the tax
base. This limitation on receipt
of additional revenue is partially mitigated by the collection of “Foregone
Taxes”; taxes which the district has a right to collect but has not.
These taxes, which would normally be collected during the tax increment
financing period, may be collected after the bonds have been paid, assuming
the law remains the same. The
amount of foregone taxes for any given year can be obtained by requesting the
Dollar Certification of Budget Request to Board of County Commissions L-2,
for the year in question. Taxing districts can recover foregone
taxes if they have a sufficient source of tax revenues.
The Urban Renewal Project can create these sources of additional tax
revenue. Idaho State law limits the increase in budgets of each taxing district and there is a limit on the amount of foregone taxes a district can collect. However, the result of an increased tax base is a decrease in the levy rate for each taxing district. This reduces taxes for each individual taxpayer within the taxing district. Table
6 Anticipated
Tax Increment Growth and Timing
Source:
Panhandle Area Council Feasibility of Tax Increment Financing of
Improvements
As a result of this analysis, the
feasibility of using the Tax Allocation Financing Provision for improvements
within the Riggins Redevelopment Area are positive given the assumptions
included in this report. Growth
assumptions applied to the development mix within the redevelopment area
indicate that there will be sufficient incremental tax revenues to pay for the
improvements if development in the area occurs as demonstrated in this
projection. Of course, this
schedule could be accelerated by a large project going into the area and
creating a large, unanticipated investment.
The impact on taxing districts is also
likely to be positive. While
there is a limit on the increase in budgets of the taxing districts, forgone
taxes can be used to increase district activity to accommodate the new growth,
or new growth can be added annually to increase district budgets in lieu of
the loss of foregone tax authority. Conclusion
The Idaho Economic Forecast, published by
the Idaho Department of Financial Management sums up the need for this type of
project in the conclusion of the January 2002 forecast: “Small businesses are a vital part of
rural America, but their ability to grow and reach new markets is hampered by
aging infrastructures, lower skilled labor, and insufficient capital.
Policymakers and community leaders must overcome these three rural
challenges to foster small business expansion in rural America.
By fostering small business expansion, many rural communities could
develop new leaders, expand job rolls, enhance worker skills, and boost local
tax receipts. One way to approach
these three rural challenges involves creating new partnerships or networks
between small businesses, rural citizens, and public institutions”. [1] In a related
section, the need for an expanded infrastructure is recommended. “Small firms
that expand their reach beyond traditional products and markets enhance their
ability to compete in today’s global economy.
But producing and delivering top-notch products still requires
high-quality infrastructures, including roads, water and schools – and
high-speed Internet connections. Much
of this infrastructure is lacking or deteriorating in rural America, tying
many small businesses to traditional products and shrinking local markets.”[2] With the
availability of the Tax Increment Financing provision in the City of Riggins,
a suitable area where public investment in infrastructure can enhance business
growth and a positive financial outlook for application of Tax Increment
Financing, the Riggins Redevelopment Area is a good candidate for use of this
financing method. Appendix
1 Tax
Valuation by Parcel
(1)
Total constitutes less than ten percent (10%) of the total assessed value of the
city. Appendix
2 Debt
service schedule
Appendix
3 Taxing
District Projections Tax Increment Available for Districts after Bond
Retirement
This
additional tax revenue may not be available without the Tax Increment Financing. Appendix
4 Total
financial projection Excel Spreadsheet Available at the Riggins City Clerk’s
Office. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||